OK, folks. I realize that this is a biased audience, but I can't think of anybody better to field my questions...
I'm a very fast QWERTY typist; I haven't measured it, but I can type notes in a lecture and very nearly get everything verbatim, so probably in the 100wpm range. I can do this without discomfort, and have no problems with pain in my fingers or hands at all. I'm 43 years old, so I've been typing QWERTY for a long time, and I have typed quite a lot in my work (both as a programmer, but also writing specs, marketing documents, responding to RFP's, and so on, and now as a full-time student attending Seminary). In short, QWERTY works really well for me.
But I'm intrigued by Colemak. Mostly, I think, because I'm a geek, and I like to try new things. I don't mind swimming upstream if I'm pretty sure that I'll find something better up there.
So, given my proficiency with QWERTY, and the fact that I'm not having any problems with comfort or RSI, is it likely that I'll see enough benefit to make a switch worthwhile? Can I expect to see a further improvement in my speed? And if I do, will it be enough to really matter? Aside from being able to confuse my wife when she tries to use my laptop, is there enough difference or benefit to make it worthwhile for me to take the speed hit that I know I'd have to take for the next few months in order to get comfortable with a new layout??
I'm interested in the thoughts and experiences of those who have been switched over for a while and can look back on the journey and comment on what I see ahead in light of their experiences.
Thanks much in advance for whatever guidance you can offer!
Eric Longman