I'm not sure if I understand your problem correctly but if I do, you can do what I did (assuming you use Windows):

Install Microsoft Keyboard Layout Creator, and open the Colemak layout from the OS layouts. Then change the keys of the layout to whichever symbols you want (basically match the original Russian or Hebrew layout) and make a new layout with the result. This way the Ctrl+key shortcuts will be the same as on Colemak on these new layouts.

If that's what you actually wanted...

Did you see for instance the Rulemak by ghen (again, follow my link)?

Letter frequencies is one thing for sure, and although I and Checkit and others looked at the European languages and found Colemak assuringly adequate for them I see that it may be very different for the Slavic and other languages. But I'll wager the Rulemak for instance is still a good shot more ergonomic for a Russian typist than the horrible horrible classic layout?

Or you can go the route I took and make your own layout for Russian (I did for Bulgarian). It might take you weeks of research, analysis and tests until you make your first version (judging by me) but it's a great fun project.

I'd used phonetic Colemak for maybe a couple of months before, and I can say I'm much happier with the layout I ended up making. And I suppose it would be easier for you if you make it for Russian, because there's probably already a lot of analysis out there. When I started, apparently no one had done anything like that before, so I had to even do the letter frequency analysis, cause the ones I found were quite old and not very accurate, as it turned out.

You can see my topic here https://forum.colemak.com/viewtopic.php?id=1206

There a pal from the forum BvoFRak gives me a great excel spreadsheet to analyze layouts. I've translated it to English and modified it to fit my needs. You can see the original from the topic, and here is the one I've been using (including the layouts) here https://www.dropbox.com/s/djbhaivm2qatw … 0v3.1.xlsm

You can change it around to fit your needs.

PS: Remember to enable macros and press "Refresh Pivot Tables" after changes to the layouts, to update all the data.

Yes, if you're not familiar with Excel, figuring out how exactly it works can be difficult. And yes, OpenOffice has limitations when it comes to spreadsheets, compared to MS Excel. I might be wrong but I also think it doesn't support macros at all.

Maybe someone else can help you with another software but this is what I used.

Sure. I think it looks decent. nothing weird other than the comma and period placement. The usage percentage on the picture is 99.95, cause some of the used symbols are on the number row and the spreadsheet is not analysing that.

Some stats. Bear in mind that I use these mainly to compare two layouts within the spread sheet. They might differ from what you can get from different analyzers due to the way they're calculated:

distance 133.39 cm (colemak-phonetic: 157.11)
same finger ratio 1.78% (Colemak ph 4.25%)
hand alternation 79.7% – you can't get higher than this (Colemak ph 56.6%)
Row jumps 0.49% (Colemak ph 2.08%)
Home/Bottom row usage 71.8/8.8% (Colemak ph 67/18.2%)