• You are not logged in.

Will I lose my qwerty skills if I move to colemak?

  • Started by harishankar
  • 27 Replies:
  • Reputation: 0
  • Registered: 24-Jul-2013
  • Posts: 13

I have been practicing on the colemak layout for a while now and my fear is that I would lose my typing skills on qwerty. Is this a normal thing to worry about or am I belng too paranoid? The thing that bothers me the most is that my fingers are so used to flying all over the keyboard that I now feel almost cramped and tight. (I am now typing this on the colemak layout although at a painfully slow speed.) I am beginning to feel more comfortable with this layout but still having to think about the key placements. Home row is no longer a problem.

So is this fear of losing an earlier skill unnatural? My current speed in qwerty is about 70-80 wpm and I can go upto 90 at times, and in colemak after a few days of typing drills is about 10-15 wpm occasionally going upto 20 and still making frequent mistakes.

This post has taken me about fifteen minutes and feels painfully slow.

Last edited by harishankar (24-Jul-2013 05:07:09)
Offline
  • 0
  • Reputation: 7
  • Registered: 21-Apr-2010
  • Posts: 818

Try this previous thread :)

Last edited by pinkyache (24-Jul-2013 06:29:32)

--
Physicians deafen our ears with the Honorificabilitudinitatibus of their heavenly Panacaea, their sovereign Guiacum.

Offline
  • 0
  • Reputation: 4
  • Registered: 08-Dec-2010
  • Posts: 656

All of us felt that fear of losing such powerful ability :-) with such speed. But somehow when you gain more confident with Colemak ability, that fear will subside.

I have switched and I dropped Qwerty completely (60wpm) when I had reached 25wpm in Colemak. You can keep both layouts, but that requires a bit of your concentration and your brain.

In my own opinion I think the maintenance cost far exceeds the portability. You still can hunt and peck in Qwerty keyboard.

For rare occasions when you need to type for quite long time at Qwerty computers, you can use this little program
http://www.ryanheise.com/colemak.exe

Run it and you can type Colemak immediately. You only need to close that program before leaving.

Last edited by Tony_VN (24-Jul-2013 09:09:43)
Offline
  • 0
  • Reputation: 0
  • Registered: 24-Jul-2013
  • Posts: 13

Thanks for the tips and pointers to previous threads.

Actually, right now I am using a different kind of hand position on the keyboard for the colemak layout by fully resting my fingers on the home row as recommended by touch typing tutors, and for qwerty I am simply typing as I normally do (allowing my hands to freely fly all over the keyboard based on my muscle memory.) and therefore so far my brain does not seem to be confused between the layouts. But I wanted to know how long I can maintain that kind of differences once I start typing more naturally with the colemak layout. As of now the typing is still very much a conscious effort.

I have also not switched over fully to colemak for my normal work. The reason for my trying the colemak layout is its stated benefits over the qwerty layout and ease of transition compared to dvorak.

I also use Linux on a day to day basis.

Offline
  • 0
  • Reputation: 4
  • Registered: 08-Dec-2010
  • Posts: 656

Your answer depends on you only since you type Qwerty with different typing posture. Ideally you can keep both way of typing, but I think that is difficult for your brain.

In my case, after 30 days I realized I have to switch to Colemak fully to further improvise and let the new Colemak muscle memory wholly imprinted in my brain. Surely it will be difficult at first and you will cling to glorious Qwerty days.

That day will come when you cannot type well in both layouts and your fingers get confused, refuse to improve. Be brave to go all the way and switch to Colemak full time to solidify your muscle memory strength.

Last edited by Tony_VN (24-Jul-2013 10:14:40)
Offline
  • 0
  • Reputation: 0
  • Registered: 04-Apr-2013
  • Posts: 538
harishankar said:

I am using a different kind of hand position on the keyboard for the colemak layout by fully resting my fingers on the home row as recommended by touch typing tutors

Bad idea ergonomically.  Most people "float" their middle and ring fingers somewhere between the home and top row, since curling them into the home row is not so comfortable.

I can't really answer anything else since I went cold turkey and forgot all about qwerty within a week.  From what I gather, some others can type in both layouts, but of course that is more difficult and less rapid.



Though this is very uncharted territory, the transitional layouts may be another option.  These are layouts with intermediate benefits, only changing a few keys at a time in order to provide a more gradual training (as well as a buffer in case of slow progress).

I can think of two possible (and mutually exclusive) theories concerning such layouts:

  1. They make it harder to switch back and forth from QWERTY - because they are so similar, they lead to more confusion when you try to do so.

  2. They make it easier to switch back and forth from QWERTY - because they are so similar, you only have to consciously change a few keys.  (Though this increases as you progress to the later layouts, the progression is gradual and gives you much more time to adjust.)

This is very uncharted territory (blame the dominance of QWERTY for such a pitiful state of research) and I don't know what to believe. The person who created minimak recently emailed me, saying that it works well for his switching between it and qwerty, but the sample size is small at best.  Perhaps you can try something similar with tarmak (going very slowly so as to keep at most two layouts in your head at a time). You would definitely be a pioneer/guinea pig in doing so, however.

Offline
  • 0
  • Reputation: 7
  • Registered: 21-Apr-2010
  • Posts: 818

From moving between layouts that are slightly different (about 6 keys), I'd say that you can get used to it, but it's still a little irritating.  Think about the variations between Apple and PC keyboards, different physical layouts between devices: modifier key placement, pageup/pagedown etc.  At first it's a drag.  Not sure if I'd say I like it, or if I'd want to swap many more keys - and go to Qwerty.

There's some proponents of Colemak that state that not being such a radical departure from Qwerty (unlike Dvorak), should help when moving over and going back to Qwerty.  But from what I read in the forum Qwerty's mostly abandoned.  I'd like to be able to touch type Qwerty - but have yet to decide if it's really worth the bother.

--
Physicians deafen our ears with the Honorificabilitudinitatibus of their heavenly Panacaea, their sovereign Guiacum.

Offline
  • 0
  • Reputation: 0
  • Registered: 24-Jul-2013
  • Posts: 13

Thanks for the further inputs. From what I gather from different sources, I think it becomes increasingly difficult to revert to qwerty once your fingers develop the muscle memory to type in colemak. I will consider that and see if I can continue practising in colemak while still typing regularly in qwerty.

I am one of those rare people who still occasionally use a typewriter (a physical manual typewriter) and though I don't type very fast on it since I want to absolutely eliminate typing errors, it may be worth not losing the skill to use a qwerty keyboard.

Still I am probably getting too ahead of myself. Let me see how much I can improve the colemak typing speed by the practice drills (I use gtypist on Linux) and see whether that affects my qwerty typing speed. Switching completely from this stage may be a bit too much for me.

Last edited by harishankar (24-Jul-2013 16:40:52)
Offline
  • 0
  • Reputation: 0
  • Registered: 24-Jul-2013
  • Posts: 13

I am now upto about 15-20 wpm with the colemak layout and steadily improving but I am not yet prepared to give up qwerty. I am able to type a bit faster noticeably and I want to do it without slowing down on qwerty. So I am now regularly alternating between the two. Let me see how it goes from here...

PS: I understand that my progress will be slow because of this but I am in no hurry.

Last edited by harishankar (26-Jul-2013 05:43:48)
Offline
  • 0
  • Reputation: 0
  • Registered: 24-Jul-2013
  • Posts: 13

I have noticed something peculiar when I took speed test today. I first typed in qwerty and I got a speed of about 84 wpm with 0 errors. which is above my average of about 75-80 on qwerty, and then immediately shifted to colemak and tried the test and broke my earlier record and achieved a rate of 21 wpm in one minute of continuous typing which is better than what I had achieved earlier.

When I did this alternating test I found myself making slightly fewer mistakes than before, especially with colemak. The funny thing is that I can now type quite fast in colemak normally than in a typing speed tester, maybe because I am less tense and less conscious about speed. I still have frequent use for the backspace key though.

Most common problem keys in colemak for me are: m->k, d->g, p/t->f, l->u. Otherwise I am quite used to this layout now.

Last edited by harishankar (26-Jul-2013 06:39:03)
Offline
  • 0
  • Reputation: 4
  • Registered: 08-Dec-2010
  • Posts: 656

Usually people only can be confident enough to drop Qwerty when they reach half Qwerty speed.

In your case, that is 40wpm in Colemak. You will be able to feel the comfort then, and see clearly how different between these two layouts yourself.

Offline
  • 0
  • Reputation: 0
  • Registered: 24-Jul-2013
  • Posts: 13

I shall definitely practice more and more now that I have gained a bit of comfort with colemak. I find myself making fewer mistakes and except for the problem keys mentioned above I am instinctively typing on the correct keys. Sometimes though I pause to think a bit but I think that will also reduce over time. Overall compared to the first few days I am gaining accuracy with the commonly used keys.

Offline
  • 0
  • Reputation: 0
  • Registered: 24-Jul-2013
  • Posts: 13

I have found something interesting - I am now able to increase my typing speed on colemak to about 25-29 wpm and still continue immediately on qwerty at about 82-84 wpm. Common words are slowly becoming patterned into my brain for colemak while in qwerty I can continue typing normally. The biggest issue I now face is making errors in colemak by trying to increase my speed and instinctively using wrong fingers. However I can easily maintain about 20-22 wpm without too much effort for common words while only yesterday it was quite frustratingly slow at around 10-15 wpm with too many mistakes.

All in all it has been an interesting learning experience. What seems to matter for speed is apparently not individual key placements but the typing pattern for words. I have to check whether the qwerty patterns will slowly be remapped or not. If it does I may have to rethink my experiment.

Offline
  • 0
  • Reputation: 0
  • Registered: 24-Jul-2013
  • Posts: 13

I have discovered something radical. I am actually learning touch typing only with the colemak layout whereas I use a three fingered method with the qwerty layout where my hand moves freely across the surface of the board and automatically presses the right keys with the nearest finger. Most of my typing is done with the middle and index finger of both hands with the ring finger coming a poor third. This means that my muscle memory for qwerty is completely different from touch typing in the first place.

What I have found is that I don't find qwerty that awkward as I don't use touch typing and I think most of the analysis for qwerty is based on the usage of fingers with the touch typing method which I don't use anyway. I have never used my little finger before for typing and suddenly using it for touch typing on the colemak has made it somewhat sore.

Moreover I hate resting my fingers on the home row or even hover somewhere in the region because my hands have got so used to rapid movements from position to position which the qwerty layout has probably taught me to adopt as my style. This means that even though I use qwerty the common disadvantages of touch typing qwerty do not apply to me because I don't touch type and my hands move to accommodate my finger reach. I am not sure what drawbacks this technique has but so far I have been using it all my typing life.

This may be one reason why I am finding touch-typing awkward. Even on a colemak, because I am simply not used to using my little finger at all for typing and suddenly using a touch typing tutor has forced this on me. To me touch typing feels quite awkward and rigid and not at all natural. But most analysis of keyboard layouts seem to make that assumption of touch typing as the basis for hand and finger strain.

Maybe I have got into bad typing habits from childhood. But I am more comfortable not at all using my little finger at all for typing and would rather move my hands slightly from time to time rather than utilize that finger. If somebody could point out to any research that says this is bad for the hands, please encourage me to continue learning to touch type on the colemak layout.

Offline
  • 0
  • Reputation: 0
  • Registered: 27-Jun-2013
  • Posts: 71

Hi,

at first I thought the same thing was happening to me. I also type qwerty with three fingers in total and my technique was completely different than my colemak typing. But as I was getting better and better in Colemak I started losing my ability to type in qwerty. My qwerty slowed all the way down from 80 wpm to 40 wpm and constantly having to look at the keyboard. My Colemak speed is at about 60 WPM right now, but I'm pretty sure that in a month or two I'll be back at 80 WPM again.

Offline
  • 0
  • Reputation: 0
  • Registered: 04-Apr-2013
  • Posts: 538
harishankar said:

If somebody could point out to any research that says this is bad for the hands, please encourage me to continue learning to touch type on the colemak layout.

Umm, requiring medical research to overturn an unjustified habit is a good way of ensuring you will never change that habit.  In particular, you won't realistically find research saying "oh, harishankar's particular hunt-and-peck technique wherein you use mostly the index and middle finger, occasionally the ring finger, and never the pinkie finger?  Yeah, we did a study with 500 participants and found it to be disadvantageous to the wrists."  Ergonomics research is sparse as it is.

That said, there are several different ways we can try to accommodate that habit:

  1. Most straightforward: stick with colemak, but don't use pinkies for most any key.  Here's a sample of my finger chart, for instance (ignore the symbols, concentrate on the colors):

    8onizxG.png

    As you can see, most keys canonically used by the pinkie are instead pressed with the ring.  The only "common keys" my pinkies still press are those on the home row - this can eventually help in strengthening them.  Ring finger use for this option may not be as sparse as you're used to, but it should be relatively manageable (it's a reasonably strong finger, anyway).

  2. Go for a layout (or better yet, create your own) that optimizes for your current style.  As a first-order optimization, you'd want to put rare keys on the pinkie slots (so that you'd less often have to move there) and common ones all around the middle (since they're easy for your index finger to reach).  The ones closest to this goal that I know of are QFMLWY or QGMLWB:

    qfmlwy.png

    qgmlwb.png     

    though you could still improve them by swapping the pinkie keys with a less common key.  Because swapping sometimes has unintentional side effects, you might prefer QFMLWY, where you'd only have to swap the D, as a base.  Alternatively, just call D/H "uncommon enough" and keep as it is.

    -

    A second-order optimization might be for common digraphs to be right next to one another, so that you could quickly hit them with your index and middle.  Unfortunately, this would probably require designing a completely new layout, and is beyond the scope of my knowledge.

  3. Middle ground: Touchtype using QFMLWY or QGMLWB.  (Incidentally, those two are  the "optimized" layouts according to carplax, so might be good to have under your sleeve anyway.)

  4. One-handed dvorak should decrease the side-by-side distance required.  Not sure what side-effects it might have, however.

    KB_Dvorak_Left.svg

All in all, I'd prefer #1 as the more "balanced" way to start practicing the pinkies.  If the O or A prove too much, you can try for #3 instead.

Finally, even if you do stick with your current typing habit, that doesn't mean you have to stick with QWERTY.  Indeed, it has the very common A under the left-pinkie finger, a disadvantage for your style compared to QFMLWY or QGMLWB.

Last edited by lalop (31-Jul-2013 01:17:23)
Offline
  • 0
  • Reputation: 0
  • Registered: 24-Jul-2013
  • Posts: 13

Lalop, thanks for the detailed post. As you say, and from my own google searches, I could not come up with too many detailed tests on keyboard layouts that assumed other typing techniques than touch-typing. The reason I asked the question is to find out whether somebody else could point out any web page which had such information.

After my touch-typing exercises recently, I developed fore-arm pain in my right arm and slight soreness in my little finger. I am not sure whether this is caused by the use of the pinky finger or the unusual rigid position of my arm (I am guessing the latter).

I kind of agree that qwerty may not be optimal even for a non-touch typing technique. Once my arm pain subsides, I will try to see if I can continue using my current typing technique and switch to colemak or another layout that doesn't force too many movements. Right now I am just breaking the test because I don't want to over-do it and cause more pain.

I probably did over-do the typing practice drills - and that obviously had some impact. Or maybe, not having learnt touch-typing at all, I was doing it the wrong way.

Offline
  • 0
  • Reputation: 0
  • Registered: 04-Apr-2013
  • Posts: 538

Pinkie soreness is to be expected, similarly for any muscles you haven't exercised before.  The forearm, I'm not sure what to make of it. I don't really have knowledge of ergonomics (unlike many of the other posters, I just use crappy laptop keyboard in whatever positions), but it seems to me that the reduced movement should only help your arm.

It's a shot in the dark, but the only question that comes to mind is: are you resting your wrists?

Last edited by lalop (29-Jul-2013 02:22:14)
Offline
  • 0
  • Reputation: 7
  • Registered: 21-Apr-2010
  • Posts: 818

@lalop, why do you ask about wrist resting?

--
Physicians deafen our ears with the Honorificabilitudinitatibus of their heavenly Panacaea, their sovereign Guiacum.

Offline
  • 0
  • Reputation: 0
  • Registered: 04-Apr-2013
  • Posts: 538

No idea.  It's a shot in the dark.  Like I said, I know nothing about ergonomics.

Offline
  • 0
  • Reputation: 0
  • Registered: 24-Jul-2013
  • Posts: 13

I normally do rest my wrists, but that is when using the laptop keyboard. Recently I've purchased a mechanical keyboard with cherry MX blue switches and I am finding it extremely good for typing. I am not sure of the fore-arm pain myself. It may be entirely unrelated to the typing. After some time, I am now all right.

The main reason I've been interested in keyboards and layouts is because I do tend to type long legal documents (it is my profession) and I wanted something better to type on than a laptop keyboard.

Offline
  • 0
  • Reputation: 4
  • Registered: 08-Dec-2010
  • Posts: 656

You've made a good choice. Blue switch is best for typing.

Offline
  • 0
  • Reputation: 0
  • Registered: 09-Apr-2013
  • Posts: 14

@Tony_VN:

"Blue switch is best for typing."

Be glad you're posting it here and not on Geekhack :-) It would be a good start for nice little flame war between you and all those ergo-clear fanatics (myself included).

Blue is fine, as long as there is no one to be annoyed by your typing.

In my opinion, loosing qwerty skill is quite natural. For me, this two layouts are too similar to use them both interchangeably, I used to touch type in qwerty, now I touch type in colemak, but I'm back to hunt and peck with qwerty.
On the other hand I went "cold turkey" and never looked back. The first month was bad, the second was annoying, but now I'm back at my old speed, and I do not think about letters I need to hit.

Did any of you learn colemak during off hours, while retaining qwerty skills at work?

Offline
  • 0
  • Reputation: 0
  • From: Malmö, Sweden
  • Registered: 10-Sep-2012
  • Posts: 122

He took the first step towards the ergo's.

P.S.
The clacks of Model M and the blues are only for real men. :D

Last edited by vaskozl (29-Jul-2013 09:40:23)

Posted without the aid of a rodent.

Offline
  • 0
  • Reputation: 0
  • From: Malmö, Sweden
  • Registered: 10-Sep-2012
  • Posts: 122
ksm123 said:

@Tony_VN:
In my opinion, loosing qwerty skill is quite natural. For me, this two layouts are too similar to use them both interchangeably, I used to touch type in qwerty, now I touch type in colemak, but I'm back to hunt and peck with qwerty.

I actually find myself still able to touch type on qwerty albeit, much slower than before. So what I usually do on qwerty is hunt and peck with 10 fingers. The similarity between the layouts makes it easy to switch, whatever you may say.

ksm123 said:

@Tony_VN:
On the other hand I went "cold turkey" and never looked back. The first month was bad, the second was annoying, but now I'm back at my old speed, and I do not think about letters I need to hit.

Same, I learned colemak by forcing myself to write all my work on it. It was insanely frustrating but it also allowed me to learn colemak in no time.

Edit: How many times have you heard that the best way to learn a language is to shove yourself amongst native speakers? I've the same opinion regarding keyboard layouts.

Last edited by vaskozl (29-Jul-2013 09:55:58)

Posted without the aid of a rodent.

Offline
  • 0