Hi guys. Here's my rather interesting Colemak story. I've tried both Dvorak and Colemak over the last couple years and reached about 40 to 50WPM on Dvorak and Colemak, using a stopwatch and word count. I average 80WPM on QWERTY,. Here are my thoughts on Dvorak and Colemak. At times I prefered Dvorak's hand alternation. I liked Colemak's roles. Coming from QWERTY Colemak feels much more natural. I noticed some of the same Dvorak shortcomings as listed on this forum and other sites. Dvorak's shortcut placement really didn't bother me too much. The LS really got to my pinky. Dvorak felt awkward at times from a QWERTY standpoint. After typing for over a decade on QWERTY I had a lot of shortcuts in muscle memory. Over time I realized that Colemak felt better to my hands. I felt more natural on Colemak than on Dvorak. Colemak's shortcut placement feels much better. Another thing that won me over is Colemak's international characters. They might not be optimal, but for me and the languages I type it's a great combination. I find myself typing Spanish and Swedish most often, followed by Italian. Now I am using Colemak exclusively. For me the easiest way to learn Colemak was to play with the layout. I didn't use any sort of typing lessons. To keep my QWERTY typing up to speed I would always type for part of the day in QWERTY. It feels nice to be able to keep fluency in both layouts, in case I have to type on someone's computer. One thing that might interest you guys is that I am a blind Colemak typist. I've always been a touch typer. I know of a couple other blind people who have tried Colemak in the past. I'm not sure if they've stuck with it or not though.
Cheers,
blmak