• You are not logged in.

    RSI 'wa' related

    • Started by bombadil
    • 11 Replies:
    • Reputation: 0
    • Registered: 06-Oct-2008
    • Posts: 71

    I wonder what all af you are doing to type without any harm the 'WA' on QWERTY or Colemak?
    Just recently I found myself enjoying Colemak for a couple of reasons, but now I have to hunt-and-peck... I feel sharp pain coming from the middle of my ring finger when pressing the key. Trying to slow down have not helped, I left touch typing for now. It is a week now with this condition so I am probably put out of the game for a longer period.

    Reading my previous thread I came to conclusion that it is indeed the 'wa' problem. I type on MS400, where the aligment of the left hand is positioned at some angle so I really not press the W stright but with a little twisted ring finger which makes twist more upon pressing the key. It would be clearer with some picture but I hope that anyone typing on MS4000 is getting what I mean - when the hand is twisted clockwise at about 8 degrees (acording to MS) it is more natural position to the wrist, but pressing the W becomes pressing the key by mowing ring finger to the outside rather than down (like you would try to press the W key to the Q position on flat keyboard). I know that this is wat cause the problem becouse I just grabbed my ring finger and tried to twist it a little - yep it now instantly hurts!

    Yet, all in all, MS4000 is commonly appreciated keyboard, I also found it easier than traditional keyboard, so I do not know if this condition would not have happened on traditional keyboard. But I cannot see the way of pressing the W key stright down.

    Does log touch typing strenghten the fingers so it doesn't matter? How long it takes? I am considerably new to touch typing, never get the qwerty, but a few months enjoyed Dvorak with no problems (probably this is because on dvorak the home row is (nearly)only used with extra keys reached by index finger).

    I would like to hear If someone else starting touchtyping with QWERTY/Colemak had similar condition.

    When I recover I go either Dvorak or go to the shop for flat keyboard 105 keys(to make the shift) or any nonstaggered/no-twisted.

    Offline
    • 0
    • Reputation: 0
    • Registered: 27-Apr-2008
    • Posts: 166

    I touch typed for many years with Qwerty. When I switched to Colemak I noticed that my right pinky started to ache, which it had never done before. I put this down to pressing down on the O key so much compared with the virtually unused semi-colon that it is on Qwerty. I think this lasted maybe for about two weeks. After that the finger was strengthened and I felt no more discomfort. Hopefully this will be the same for you.

    I've never been a fan of 'ergonomic' keyboards. I don't like how they shrink some keys and make some others larger. Plus if you have to use a standard keyboard, you would probably be all fingers and thumbs. For me the great thing about Colemak is I can use it on any keyboard, and I don't feel discomfort. I'd say bin that 'ergo' board and get a good mechanical one instead.

    Edit: Most of these ergonomic 'boards are designed to lessen the effects of your fingers jumping all over the place using Qwerty. Don't use Qwerty and ergo, you won't need an ergonomic keyboard.

    Last edited by simonh (17-Oct-2008 20:44:24)

    "It is an undoubted truth, that the less one has to do, the less time one finds to do it in." - Earl of Chesterfield

    Offline
    • 0
    • Reputation: 0
    • Registered: 17-Mar-2008
    • Posts: 192

    I disagree with Simon. I have found that ergonomic boards go very well with Colemak. I have owned a Kinesis which was nice, and am currently using a TypeMatrix. jammycakes is using a natural ergonomic and I believe he feels it goes well with Colemak.

    I have never had any problems with my ring fingers, and I certainly don't find 'wa' uncomfortable. Perhaps if you are new to touch typing you should back off practicing a little to let your body catch up.

    Offline
    • 0
    • Reputation: 0
    • Registered: 27-Apr-2008
    • Posts: 166
    tomlu said:

    I disagree with Simon.

    Yeah, I get that a lot!

    I know a lot of people use, and love, ergonomic 'boards. I looked into getting one myself (due to discomfort with Qwerty). Ultimately what put me off was the premium price for a cheap, spongy, membrane keyboard due to it being 'ergonomic', and the mangling of the keys that bombadil has written about.

    The point I'm trying to get across is that I find Colemak is well suited for a regular staggered keyboard that most of the world has used since the typewriter first appeared.

    Jammycakes has had problems using Colemak on a laptop. I haven't. Many other's haven't.

    Any keyboard layout that relies on, or encourages, a special keyboard to make it more comfortable goes against what Colemak was designed for:

    "...efficient and ergonomic touch typing in English."

    That's why I say - forget about ergonomic keyboards. They are just a crutch for the inefficiencies of Qwerty.

    "It is an undoubted truth, that the less one has to do, the less time one finds to do it in." - Earl of Chesterfield

    Offline
    • 0
    • Reputation: 0
    • From: Horsham, West Sussex, UK
    • Registered: 11-Jun-2007
    • Posts: 86
    simonh said:

    Any keyboard layout that relies on, or encourages, a special keyboard to make it more comfortable goes against what Colemak was designed for:

    "...efficient and ergonomic touch typing in English."

    That's why I say - forget about ergonomic keyboards. They are just a crutch for the inefficiencies of Qwerty.

    I completely disagree there. In my experience, qwerty is better on a flat keyboard than an ergonomic one. With Colemak it's the other way around.

    Offline
    • 0
    • Reputation: 0
    • Registered: 06-Oct-2008
    • Posts: 71

    It's probably me, I rushed so hungry for touch typing that my body cannot catch up the pace.

    Simon, I agree, the reversed slope on MS4000 is only to ease qwerty typing. I am actualy thinking of some flat but split keyboard.

    Funny thing what I saw once was a guy that typed qwerty with right hand mowed one key leftwards - his home row was ASDF HJKL.

    Offline
    • 0
    • Reputation: 0
    • Registered: 27-Apr-2008
    • Posts: 166
    jammycakes said:

    I completely disagree there. In my experience, qwerty is better on a flat keyboard than an ergonomic one. With Colemak it's the other way around.

    Maybe I missed something here. I thought Colemak was designed to be used on regular keyboards. That is its main feature. Comfortable typing on a standard keyboard.

    Well, I use Colemak on a standard keyboard and have done for the last six months. I have never felt any discomfort (other than the right pinky issue mentioned earlier) since switching. I know your experience is different to mine but if what you say is true, then there is no need for Colemak or Dvorak, or any other layout designed for standard, staggered keyboards because Qwerty is perfectly fine!?

    Are you honestly suggesting that those of us who have sought an alternative to Qwerty (due to RSI, CTS etc) using a standard keyboard are imagining things?

    Last edited by simonh (18-Oct-2008 21:55:40)

    "It is an undoubted truth, that the less one has to do, the less time one finds to do it in." - Earl of Chesterfield

    Offline
    • 0
    • Reputation: 214
    • From: Viken, Norway
    • Registered: 13-Dec-2006
    • Posts: 5,371

    Yes, I do believe that you missed something here Simon. Jammycakes' statement "In my experience, QWERTY is better on A than B, whereas Colemak is better on B than A" does not translate into "QWERTY is better than Colemak". I read it to mainly mean that James found Colemak to work well on an ergonomic board, as he's said before. No idea how you read it?

    *** Learn Colemak in 2–5 steps with Tarmak! ***
    *** Check out my Big Bag of Keyboard Tricks for Win/Linux/TMK... ***

    Offline
    • 0
    • Reputation: 0
    • From: Horsham, West Sussex, UK
    • Registered: 11-Jun-2007
    • Posts: 86

    @DreymaR: You're spot on there. I'm not saying that there's no need for Colemak or Dvorak or anything like that by any means. I'm not attacking Colemak here, I'm defending ergonomic keyboards. They are not a crutch for qwerty -- in fact, if anything, they make qwerty more awkward in some ways.

    The fact of the matter is that Colemak is concerned with your fingers, whereas ergonomic keyboards are concerned with your wrists.

    Last edited by jammycakes (20-Apr-2013 18:17:41)
    Offline
    • 0
    • Reputation: 214
    • From: Viken, Norway
    • Registered: 13-Dec-2006
    • Posts: 5,371

    That's an interesting thought. Now, my Colemak has nothing against my wrists and vice versa; maybe that's just because I use the bottom row half shift?

    The one thing I do find gets awkward about using a straight board and straight wrists, is reaching for the corner positions GJ - I think Shai was right when he suggested that those two get more difficult by keeping the wrists straight. I suppose that a proper curved board would fix that. Meanwhile, the J is happily rare enough and I feel that I'm getting the hang of the G eventually. It's not so much that it hurts to type or gets mistyped a lot, but it takes a bit too long and just doesn't feel right like most of the other keys do.

    *** Learn Colemak in 2–5 steps with Tarmak! ***
    *** Check out my Big Bag of Keyboard Tricks for Win/Linux/TMK... ***

    Offline
    • 0
    • Reputation: 2
    • From: Houston, Texas
    • Registered: 03-Jan-2007
    • Posts: 358

    Curious, early on with Colemak, G and J were a real problem and I mistyped them a lot except in one special instance. I seemed to pretty early on get the hang of 'ING'.  That got fast very quickly. I use straight wrists on a flat keyboard. 99% of my touch typing is on my Macbook since I don't even own a desktop computer anymore because mobility is critical to what I do in my business.

    Now I don't even think about G and J, my arms just move automatically to reduce the stretch.


    and with straight wrists,  "wa" is a quick small arm movement and flick,  never felt any problem with it at all.

    Last edited by keyboard samurai (20-Oct-2008 00:34:19)
    Offline
    • 0
    • Reputation: 0
    • Registered: 31-Dec-2008
    • Posts: 35

    This hasn't happened to me, but I have a tendency to switch to 6 or 8 finger typing and not use my pinkies or ring fingers as much. This puts the strain on my wrists instead.

    Offline
    • 0