• You are not logged in.

    A dvorak typist view on Colemak

    • Started by Bvorak
    • 3 Replies:
    • Reputation: 0
    • Registered: 04-Feb-2011
    • Posts: 26

    I started up the non-qwerty typist journey one month ago from a gossip with friends on alternative layout. I learnt the Dvorak story long ago from computer science class but never really typed on the alternative not until I found the the world fastest typist broke the record by Dvorak.

    After one month of dedicated training, I have totally abandoned the qwerty layout in my home and office computer and start using dvorak to type documents, emailing and even type login password. I am able to type Dvorak at 1/3 of my original qwerty speed without burning my head to search for key location. With Free software such as typefaster, i get used to the new layout just as if i acquire a second language.

    During the transition, i learn that non qwerty layout not only limited to Dvorak but also dozens of others. Colemak is the second most gossiped just behind dvorak.

    it is no superiority to me using either dvorak or colemak. it is a matter of community support, no. of raving fans and os infrastructure that detetmine my choice to stick with dvorak. Colemak inherits the advantages of qwerty and dvorak, that's well thought and designed. However, it lacks of the above make me consider it an unwise investment to change my typing behaviour to colemak considering the decades behind as i believe that Microsoft , Mac and Linux will continue to provide dvorak layout by default in windows 8, 9, 10...and ubuntu 11, 12, 13...until my last day in the world!

    I advocate the concept of 'open keyborad'. The open keyboard should be a freedom keyboard with only blank key caps. Everyone should be able to select their own keyboard layout or design their own. Typing using touch type enable cross layout transtition by software switch. So everyone will be free to select their own style absolutly free!

    Free the keyboard!
    Open the layout!

    Offline
    • 0
    • Reputation: 4
    • Registered: 08-Dec-2010
    • Posts: 656

    Not all people can touch type, therefore Qwerty will continue to dominate the world.

    When Qwerty people need to change they will choose Colemak since they only have to learn 17 keys, instead of 33 keys if they want to learn Dvorak.

    For Dvorak users, they can stay with their layout, since Dvorak is already ergonomic and efficient.

    Offline
    • 0
    • Reputation: 7
    • Registered: 21-Apr-2010
    • Posts: 818

    I get what you are saying, but touch typing is such an investment in time and effort - I doubt you'll convince the masses to adopt.

    As above, a printed layout assists the non touch typist.  And if anything something more intuitive than Qwerty would be better.  Even Dvorak - as at least it groups the vowels.  Assuming everyone in the world uses a latin based alphabet - which of course they don't.

    I wonder if casual non touch typists would be phased at all if you switched the printed layouts on the keyboard.

    If anything - I see more merit in software driven input devices.  Which are 'probably' easier to prototype and quicker to get used to.

    Keyboards are so last century...

    --
    Physicians deafen our ears with the Honorificabilitudinitatibus of their heavenly Panacaea, their sovereign Guiacum.

    Offline
    • 0
    • Reputation: 2
    • From: Houston, Texas
    • Registered: 03-Jan-2007
    • Posts: 358
    pinkyache said:

    If anything - I see more merit in software driven input devices.  Which are 'probably' easier to prototype and quicker to get used to.

    Keyboards are so last century...

    Yes, for casual or general use, likely see things go more and more in this direction...
    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/29/techn … pogue.html

    and watching Watson on Jeopardy was impressive until one reads this,
    http://news.cnet.com/8301-17852_3-20032244-71.html

    but that's the trend more likely to take over than any keyboard layout alternative

    Offline
    • 0