• You are not logged in.

Reduce same-finger utilization?

  • Started by Antithesis
  • 27 Replies:
  • Reputation: 7
  • Registered: 21-Apr-2010
  • Posts: 818

@bvofrak, interesting - how do you come up with these?  You could call that layout: Ug!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ug_%28book%29

--
Physicians deafen our ears with the Honorificabilitudinitatibus of their heavenly Panacaea, their sovereign Guiacum.

Offline
  • 0
  • Reputation: 0
  • Registered: 27-Apr-2011
  • Posts: 17

Well, I didn't see that!
Witch few H more, you have my first name!

Offline
  • 0
  • Reputation: 4
  • Registered: 04-Feb-2010
  • Posts: 149

Ok, I'm just going to throw this out there, as it is somewhat related to the thread topic, but mostly as I just discovered it: You can use a qwerty keyboard to type steno. For those of you that didn't immediately do a double take and reread that last sentence, or those of you are convinced that it must have been a typo, let me repeat that: You can use a QWERTY keyboard, to type STENO.

I just posted this link in another thread, but here it is again.

Plover! Also, a browser demo. Hint: backspace will foul up the demo. If it goes odd, reload.

Of course the caveats are that steno is a vaguely phonetic shorthand system, and it doesn't do letter by letter. Shorthand should vary person to person, dependent on their needs and usage. While there is a built in translations of the top 3000 words (or something), rote memorization is discouraged, and adding your own entries is encouraged. Also, the steno layout on a qwerty keyboard makes the thumb buttons massively awkward.

Still, the world's record for a steno typist is something like 374 WPM... not really sure how useful that skill would actually be, but I'll be damned if it doesn't sound nice.

Last edited by cevgar (05-Jul-2012 15:57:13)
Offline
  • 0