• You are not logged in.

    My turn at the Colemak layout

    • Started by Dobly
    • 3 Replies:
    • Reputation: 0
    • Registered: 15-Apr-2011
    • Posts: 2

    Today I am sitting at my work PC complaining to one of my workmates how my right wrist is sore.

    This could be due to a couple of things..

    The first is the mouse. I'm a programmer. ASP.NET web applications specifically, and spend some time each day using the mouse.

    The second is the gym, where lift weights. Lots of strain on the wrists there.

    However it was in my research of the mouse vs wrist issue that I started seeing messages about the effect of your keyboard layout on your wrist. If that's so then I'm happy to try anything in a quest for a cure.

    First, I moved my mouse to my left hand.

    Then I began my research on keyboard layouts.  I looked at them all. Long story short, here I am.

    I have just installed the Colemak layout, TypeFaster and the Colemak files for it. Let the games begin.

    The last 20 years or so I have been using a qwerty keyboard. On a good day when I'm doing lots of typing, I might crack 50wpm.  Fast enough for what I do.

    As for my keyboard itself it's one of those Microsoft ergonomic split types. It's not possible to move the keys around but frankly I would not bother with that anyway. Looking is a no no in touch typing.

    So far I'm as noob as noob can be. I've run TypeFaster in my lunch break today for the first time and ran Lesson 1 three times. This is the Lesson where you type words like 'seen tenet sestest nene'. Home row,  two fingers on each hand. 

    Took me three goes to get my speed from 8wpm to a blistering 17wpm! (I can tell your impressed) ;)

    Seriously but, I like what I have seen so far.

    For now it will be a lunch time exercise. But when I can confidently type all of the letters, even at a modest 25 to 30 wpm, I'll make the switch. That is heaps fast enough for coding (most of the time).

    Offline
    • 0
    • Reputation: 0
    • Registered: 07-Oct-2010
    • Posts: 28

    Hey, nice to have another convert. If you keep at it, who knows you may even surpass your qwerty speed. I type faster in my colemak speed than I did with qwerty! Ahh those speeds reminds me when I first started as well - the good times ^^ !! Don't worry...you will get there...eventually.

    I don't know, but I'm not a fan of these 'ergonomic' things. A real ergonomic keyboard will have symmetrical staggering, or perhaps no staggering at all (like the numpad).

    You said that you 'spend some time each day using the mouse' - lol don't we all? IF you mean that you probably spend more time on the mouse than "normal" or flicking between the mouse and keyboard more than what "normal" people do, then I would heavily recommend a keyboard without the num-pad so you can place it closer to yourself. This obviously calls into question how often you use the num-pad at all, if you don't use it much then obviously not a problem or you could use an external/usb num-pad for numerical entry.

    Offline
    • 0
    • Reputation: 0
    • Registered: 15-Apr-2011
    • Posts: 2

    Today (Monday) back at work I have converted 100% to Colemak. << (This took me about 20 seconds to type)

    TypeFaster tells me I am pumping at the keys at a smokin 13wpm.

    I have decided to go cold turkey with Colemak. Hey, that would look good on a T-shirt. . .

    "I Went Cold Turkey With Colemak"  :-)

    I'll report back on Friday with my progress.

    Offline
    • 0
    • Reputation: 2
    • Registered: 18-Apr-2008
    • Posts: 21

    Keep after it, Dobly!  It gets much easier after a while.  Soon enough, you will dislike having to use qwerty because it feels so unwieldy.  I will never go back full time, even though I can still bang out qwerty pretty easily by sight.

    Offline
    • 0