I understand what your are saying about the underlining, but wibble's point is still valid in the sense that changing what underlining means in the last case (changing it's meaning to indicate right hand rather than left hand) is a cardinal sin of illustration.  It prevents the reader from making an easy visual comparison.  Trust the reader to see the shift in hand prominence.  To change the meaning of underlining only leads to confusion.

A couple of questions come to my mind. 

Isn't Colemak's hand alternation here in comparison to Qwerty due almost if not entirely to putting the most common letter in English, 'e', on the right hand? 

How prominent is the Dvorak right hand usage really if you subtract out the use of the right thumb, a strong finger, for the space bar?  What if a Dvorak user practiced using the left thumb for the space bar rather the right as way to change the balance?  (I just switched to using my left thumb for the space bar in typing these sentences, interesting.)

Well if you point out something and it's corrected immediately and you're still miffed about it then I'm feeling reasonably sure that you are yourself unfairly biased against this site. In which case, feel free to wander off and I hope you ponder out something good eventually.  :p

In case you haven't wandered off yet as promised, maybe you'd like to suggest an improvement of the text yourself?

There is no need to 'suggest an improvement,' the obvious solution to the problem is to show the comparison like with like.

Changing the terms of reference mid-comparison:
(a) does not allow the reader to make a true comparison
(b) misleads those who do not notice that the switch has been made and
(c) leaves those who DO notice the switch wondering why the switch was necessary in the first place.

I'm afraid I feel the same way. It seems like you guys are spending an awful lot of time explaining why Colemak is better than everything else. Sure, it's a great layout, but you don't see Michael Capewell or Whatshisname Klausler running around telling everyone how great their keyboards are. I think you should lay out the facts on your site, and stop talking about how incredible your layout is. Not to say it's not, but it should speak for itself. I have nothing against your layout, but you Colemak supporters are coming on very strongly. It's as if you're saying, "Use Colemak or you will be damned for eternity! Plus it's good."

Well, to the best of my knowledge Capewell and Klausler aren't actively involved in layouts these days and Capewell hasn't finished his project. Furthermore, none of their layouts have a substantial number of users even compared with little Colemak. Correct me if I'm wrong. So if they don't have a community of users and don't have themselves actively supporting their layouts, who's to run around telling anyone anything?

More to the point, why shouldn't we be enthusiastic? It's as Samurai says. I've found a great thing, I care about it, I feel like chatting about it on its' own forums with all the enthusiasm I'm feeling. If that puts you off, well, too bad and frankly I feel like saying shame on you for being so petty about things.

Reading web fora is completely optional. This is the down-to-earth one in my portfolio. If you think it is too strong, then I wonder what you think about most of the internet?

And no, no Colemak user I can think of would be saying anything even remotely along the vein of "Use Colemak or you will be damned for eternity!" (unless in a clearly jesting context). On the contrary, I'm pleased to see that users of other layouts are met with rational and calm argument and quite often told that they may be perfectly happy staying with the layout they're presently using - especially if it's an improved one like Dvorak/Capewell/Arensito etcetera. If I'm wrong and you're not fighting straw men here, please show me a quote illustrating your claim.

If anyone has come through as too strong here, I'd suggest it is you SpeedMorph.